| 黄勇 胡友德 刘志勇 郑金泉 张丽萍.附着体可摘局部义齿修复后患者满意度的调查[J].实用中西医结合临床,2005,(3):11-12 |
| 附着体可摘局部义齿修复后患者满意度的调查 |
|
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 义齿 精确附着式 牙列缺损 满意度 |
| 英文关键词: attachment denture dentition defect satisfaction |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 504 |
| 全文下载次数: 289 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：比较游离端牙列缺损患者行附着体可摘局部义齿和传统可摘局部义齿修复的主观感受。方法：为46例游离端牙列缺损患者制作19件附着体可摘局部义齿（每件义齿设计1~2副附着体）和27件传统可摘局部义齿，戴用义齿经1~2次修改，于修复后1个月行满意度问卷调查。结果：附着体可摘局部义齿在外观、舒适性、稳固性、咀嚼功能、语音功能5个单项满意度及均满意度方面高于传统可摘局部义齿，差异有非常显著性（P <0.01），在易清洁单项的满意度上低于传统可摘局部义齿，差异有非常显著性（P <0.01）。结论：游离端牙列缺损患者行附着体可摘局部义齿修复，较传统可摘局部义齿能更好地满足患者需求，达到良好的修复效果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To investigate the satisfaction of patients with attachment removable partial denture(ARPD)and that with conventional removable partial denture(CRPD). Methods:19 pieces of ARPD and 27 pieces of CRPD were manufactured for 46 patients with free-end dentition defect,and the investigation on the satisfaction of patients with ARPD and CRPD was made by using satisfaction questionnaire after a month. Results: The satisfaction of patients with ARPD in appearance, comfort, stability, mastication and speaking functions was much more higher than with CRPD, but lower in cleaning, and there was a significantly difference between them(P <0.01).Conclusion: ARPD could get a better restoring effects on patients with free-end dentition defect under some conditions,comparing with CRPD. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
