| 钟胜英.手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法在ABO、RhD血型抗原鉴定中的应用效果[J].实用中西医结合临床,2017,17(5):4-5 |
| 手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法在ABO、RhD血型抗原鉴定中的应用效果 |
| he Identification Effect of Manual Microcolumn Gel Immunoassay in ABO, RhD Blood Antigen |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 血型 抗原鉴定 手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法 试管法 |
| 英文关键词: Blood type Antigen identification Manual microcolumn gel immunoassay method Tube method |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 830 |
| 全文下载次数: 308 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：观察手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法在ABO、RhD血型抗原鉴定中的应用效果。方法：选择2015年1月~2016年12月在我院健康体检者1 059例作为研究对象，分别采取手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法和常规试管法进行ABO、RhD血型抗原鉴定，对这两种检验方法的血型抗原检验结果进行统计分析。结果：手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法与常规试管法的血型检验方法对体检者ABO、RhD血型抗原检验结果符合率为100%，两种方法比较，检验结果差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：在血型检验过程中，手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法与试管法的检验结果无明显差异，但手工微柱凝胶免疫检验法相对于试管法具有操作方便、结果判断清晰、灵敏度更高的优势，临床价值显著。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To evaluate the identification effect of manual microcolumn gel immunoassay in ABO, RhD blood antigen. Methods: 1 059 Cases of healthy population in our hospital were selected from January 2015 to December 2016 as the research object, were respectively take test manual microcolumn gel immunoassay and routine tube method in the identification of ABO, RhD blood antigen, the result of two methods were statistically analyzed. Results: The coincidence rate of blood identification method of the two methods were 100% for the ABO and RhD blood antigen, and there was of no significant difference between the two methods (P＞0.05). Conclusion: In the blood identification,there were of no significant difference between the manual microcolumn gel immunoassay method and the routine tube method, and the manual microcolumn gel immunoassay method has the advantages of convenient operation, the result is more clear and more sensitive, has significant clinical value, worthy of attention and promotion. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
