| 甘丽.中西医结合治疗卒中后抑郁的临床探究[J].实用中西医结合临床,2016,16(4): |
| 中西医结合治疗卒中后抑郁的临床探究 |
| Clinical Depression after stroke treatment Integrative Medicine |
| 投稿时间：2016-03-03 修订日期：2016-03-18 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 卒中 抑郁 中西医结合 临床疗效 不良反应 |
| 英文关键词: Stroke Depression Integrative Medicine Clinical efficacy Adverse reactions |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 867 |
| 全文下载次数: 342 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨中西医结合方法治疗卒中后抑郁的临床疗效。方法：将86例卒中后抑郁患者随机分为研究组和对照组,每组43例。对照组给予西药帕罗西汀治疗,研究组给予西药帕罗西汀联合中药自拟活血通络方治疗。结果：治疗前两组患者的HAMD量表(汉密顿抑郁量表)评分比较无明显差异(P>0.05),治疗后1个月、2个月研究组的HAMD量表评分,明显低于对照组(P<0.05)；观察组不良反应发生率为8.8%,对照组不良反应发生率为6.6%,两组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论：中西医结合方法治疗卒中后抑郁的临床疗效明显优于单纯西医治疗,安全性高,值得临床推广应用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of post-stroke depression. Methods: 86 cases of post-stroke depression were randomly divided into the study group and the control group ,43 cases of each group. The control group received medicine paroxetine treatment , the study group received medicine paroxetine combined with traditional Chinese medicine self Huoxuetongluo Recipe treatment. Results: The two groups of patients before treatment HAMD scale (Hamilton Depression Scale) score was not significantly different (P>0.05); after 1 month, 2 months of the study group HAMD scale scores were lower than the control group (P<0.05); the study group occurrence of adverse drug reactions rate was 8.8%, the control group occurrence of adverse drug reactions rate was 6.6%, the two groups was no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion: Integrative Medicine clinical efficacy of treatment of stroke depression was significantly better than western medicine, safe, worthy of clinical promotion and application. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
