丁柱 朱兆洪 吴文锐.游离植皮联合负压引流技术治疗皮肤缺损的临床观察[J].实用中西医结合临床,2013,(4):8-9 |
游离植皮联合负压引流技术治疗皮肤缺损的临床观察 |
|
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 封闭负压引流 游离植皮 皮肤缺损 |
英文关键词: Vacuum sealing drainage Free dermatoplasty Cutaneous defect |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 542 |
全文下载次数: 287 |
中文摘要: |
目的:观察游离植皮结合持续负压吸引治疗皮肤缺损的临床疗效。方法:对符合植皮条件的65例皮肤缺损患者随机分组:VSD组(35例)植皮后采用VSD进行创面加压,打包组(30例)植皮后采用传统打包加压,术后10 d拆除VSD及加压包, 观察植皮成活率及创面愈合优良率。结果:VSD组植皮创面愈合优良率(88.6%)明显高于传统打包组(70.0%),差异具有明显统计学意义(P<0.01);创面愈合平均时间VSD组(11.86±0.91) d,打包组(12.57±0.90) d,差异具有明显统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:VSD可促进游离植皮成活及创面恢复,疗效优于传统打包植皮。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of free dermatoplasty combined vacuum sealing drainage(VSD) in the treatment
of cutaneous defects.Methods: Sixty-five patients with cutaneous defects were divided into two groups randomly. The VSD group(35 cases) used the treatment of free dermatoplasty with moderate thickness skin combined VSD .The tie-over group (30 cases) used tie-over method. The dressings and VSD were removed ten days late after operation. Evaluated the efficacy of each group and the average time of the wound healed up. Results:The excellent outcome rate of VSD group (88.6%) had significant difference with the tie-over group(70.0%).The average time of the wound’s healing up of VSD group was 11.86 days,while the control group was 12.57 days. The difference of the two groups was notable.Conclusion: Free dermatoplasty combined VSD can promote the wound’s healing and its clinical efficacy is better than tie-over. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |